🔗VS🧬
n8n vs Relevance AI
Agents & Automation — Side-by-side comparison
Quick Verdict
n8n has a higher rating (4.5 vs 4.2). Relevance AI is more affordable starting at $19/mo.
Pricing Comparison
n8n
Self-hostedFree
Starter$24/mo
Pro$60/mo
Relevance AI
FreeFree
Pro$19/mo
Team$199/mo
Feature Comparison
| Feature | n8n | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | ✓ | — |
| AI Integration | ✓ | — |
| 400+ Integrations | ✓ | — |
| Conditional Logic | ✓ | — |
| Webhooks | ✓ | — |
| Custom Code Nodes | ✓ | — |
| API Access | ✓ | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — |
| Team Collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free Tier (self-hosted) | ✓ | — |
| AI Agent Builder | — | ✓ |
| Knowledge Base | — | ✓ |
| Visual Workflow Builder | — | ✓ |
| API Deployment | — | ✓ |
| Multi-step Agents | — | ✓ |
| Document Processing | — | ✓ |
| Custom Tools | — | ✓ |
| Monitoring Dashboard | — | ✓ |
| Free Tier | — | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
n8n
Pros
+ Free self-hosted option
+ Code escape hatch for developers
+ AI agent nodes built in
+ Fair-code license
Cons
- Self-hosting requires technical skills
- Smaller integration library than Make
- Cloud pricing adds up
- UI less polished than Make
Relevance AI
Pros
+ No-code agent builder
+ Knowledge base integration
+ Free tier with 100 runs/day
+ API deployment for built agents
Cons
- Team tier is expensive
- Limited integrations vs Make/n8n
- Learning curve for complex agents
- Smaller community
Best For
n8n
DevelopersSelf-hosting enthusiastsTeams wanting full controlAI workflow builders
Relevance AI
Teams building custom AI workflowsNo-code AI buildersSupport teamsInternal tool builders